. . .
. New Jersey newspapers, notably
The Star-Ledger, have moved away from the daily reporting and endless
editorials which slammed Governor Chris Christie about the so-called
‘Bridgegate’ affair?
On June 13, Fallon and Christie dance away the 'Bridgegate' incident. |
The reason is that despite the millions in cash and the
thousands of man-hours expended up to this point investigating Christie and
what role he may have played in this
incident, not a single person or entity has identified a scintilla of evidence to
prove that the governor ordered the closing
of two access lanes in Fort Lee, New Jersey that lead to the George
Washington Bridge, and across the Hudson River into New York City.
Nor has anyone been able to show that Christie either ordered
the closures, knew of them in advance, or that he subsequently blessed their
implementation for the ostensible political purpose of punishing a Democrat
mayor who, it was alleged, refused to endorse Christie’s second term, landslide
re-election to the governor’s office in The Garden State.
Even the New Jersey Legislature’s Select Investigation
Committee co-chaired by Assemblyman John
Wisniewski and State Senator
Loretta Weinberg, has not been able to come up with any credible evidence
of direct or indirect involvement by Christie in the closing of those two lanes
(the third remained open) which led to massive traffic backups.
Wisniewski, the most publicly vocal person on the select committee
and a hardened Christie opponent, admitted to Steve Strunsky, a reporter for
The Star-Ledger, that he had once entertained aspirations to run for governor,
but that the timing had not been in his favor.
In ongoing commentary printed in the Ledger, Wisniewski has
been consistently adamant that he could not believe that Christie did not know
what was going on with ‘Bridgegate.’
Well, believe.
Because New Jersey’s governor has been just as adamant in
his public denials of involvement, and with his quick dismissal of those who were
shown to have initiated and implemented the four-day, two-lane closing.
One more thing: If
Christie has not been truthful about his oft-repeated, nationally publicized
claims of denial of participation in those lane closures, his political
credibility will come screeching to an end.
There are fools in politics, but Christie is no fool – not
by a longshot. He knows what the
consequences of such a strategy would be.
Also, on a personal level, he is a family man, and he also understands
how the stain of lying would spread to his close friends and loved ones.
In the op-ed section of yesterday’s print edition of The
Star-Ledger, Carl Golden writes that the “Bridgegate
probe needs an exit strategy.”
That is a clear signal to Wisniewski and Weinberg that this
is now prime time for them to move out of the corner into which they have
inadvertently painted themselves.
Golden
writes that 'Bridgegate' is “a fading
political drama,” and that “there are
already signs of weariness with the investigation and its cost.” Polling results support Golden’s conclusions.
Even Stephen Sweeney, a Democrat and Senate President said
during what now seems like a long-ago meeting with the editorial board of The
Star-Ledger, that the select committee should have ended its investigation. For that, Sweeney was promptly excoriated in
print by the Ledger’s editorial board, as well as by his Democrat colleagues. He was forced to recant.
For those who may not know Sweeney’s record, he is a tough
leader who has been very independent in his political dealings with
Christie. Yet he’s worked closely with
the governor in getting legislation passed when he concurred with him, and he
has opposed him when he did not agree.
Sweeney is no one’s lap dog, not even the Ledger’s.
Perhaps the only wild card left that could seriously damage
Christie is the investigation into ‘Bridgegate’ by United
States Attorney for New Jersey, Paul Fishman. Acting professionally, his office has not
revealed any information about its work into ‘Bridgegate,’ citing that it does
not comment on ongoing investigations.
Previously, Fishman’s office had requested that the New
Jersey Legislature’s select committee do nothing to interfere with its
investigation.
However, that request does not seem to have had much effect
on the stream of public commentary taken up and printed by The Star-Ledger of
John Wisniewski’s endless months of speculative talk. On the other hand, Loretta Weinberg, not
particularly an admirer of Christie, has demonstrated far more restraint.
Thanks for reading. (Click on the image for an enhanced view.)
No comments:
Post a Comment